(NationalFreedomPress.com) – Attorney General Pam Bondi has directly blamed former President Joe Biden’s controversial autopen practices for contributing to the tragic shooting of two National Guard members in Washington, D.C., by an Afghan national previously granted asylum.
Story Snapshot
- AG Pam Bondi blames Biden’s autopen use for DC shooting involving Afghan national
- Two National Guard members gunned down in Washington, D.C.
- Shooter was Afghan national granted asylum during Trump administration
- Bondi calls out “progressive left idiots” for dangerous policies
Bondi Targets Biden’s Autopen Practices
Attorney General Pam Bondi launched a scathing attack on former President Biden’s widespread use of the autopen system, directly connecting it to the recent shooting incident in the nation’s capital. Bondi specifically called out “these progressive left idiots” for implementing policies that she argues contributed to this tragic outcome. Her criticism highlights growing conservative concerns about the previous administration’s approach to immigration and document processing that may have compromised national security.
National Guard Members Targeted in DC Attack
Two National Guard members were gunned down in Washington, D.C., by an Afghan national who had previously been granted asylum in the United States. The attack occurred in the heart of the nation’s capital, raising serious questions about vetting processes and ongoing security threats from individuals processed under previous immigration policies. This incident underscores the real-world consequences of what many conservatives view as reckless immigration practices that prioritized speed over thorough security screening.
Immigration Policy Failures Under Scrutiny
The shooter’s status as an asylum recipient originally processed during the Trump administration has created complex questions about how subsequent Biden-era policies may have affected monitoring and follow-up procedures. Bondi’s criticism appears focused on how the autopen system potentially streamlined processes without adequate oversight, allowing dangerous individuals to slip through cracks in the system. This case exemplifies conservative warnings about the dangers of prioritizing administrative efficiency over rigorous security protocols when dealing with asylum seekers and refugees.
Copyright 2025, nationalfreedompress.com
